Physicists: The Universe Had a Beginning

The Universe Had a Beginning

As an idea, the 'big bang' just doesn't cut it—that is, it is no longer sufficient for its intended task.

In fact, it never was. What was its intended task? To provide a godless means of explaining the origin of the cosmos. However, even diehard atheist physicists are abandoning the big bang, given its increasingly evident failures to fit the known facts of the universe.

But there's another reason why "many physicists have been fighting a rearguard action against it for decades", as a recent editorial in New Scientist explained.That is, its alleged "theological overtones". The New Scientist editorial put it this way: "If you have an instant of creation, don't you need a creator?"

The editorial then outlines how cosmologists had, over a number of years, come up with "several different models of the universe that dodge the need for a beginning while still requiring a big bang. But recent research has shot them full of holes. It now seems certain that the universe did have a beginning."

'All the evidence we have says that the universe had a beginning.'—Cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin, Tufts University, Boston (USA), January 2012. There is an article by Lisa Grossman and soberly titled/subtitled: "Death of the eternal cosmos—from the cosmic egg to the infinite multiverse, every model of the universe has a beginning." The article relates how physicists such as Stephen Hawking "tend to shy away from cosmic genesis" in order to avoid "the thorny question", i.e. the need for, a supernatural creator. They had relied upon models designed to dodge the origins problem, such as an eternally inflating or cyclic universe, which give the appearance of time continuing indefinitely in the past as well as the future.

Counter-intuitively these models had been constructed to be compatible with the big bang. I.e. the big bang was not the beginning. However, as cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin of Tufts University in Boston explained earlier this year, hope in these ideas "may now be dead". Vilenkin showed that all these models still demand a beginning. They do not stretch back in true infinity; rather, there is still a "start of everything."

Of the eternal inflation model, Vilenkin says that, "You can't construct a space-time with this property"—the equations simply don't work. "It can't possibly be eternal in the past. There must be some kind of boundary."

And Vilenkin said that while cyclic universes have an "irresistible poetic charm and bring to mind the Phoenix" (quoting the late Belgian astronomer and priest Georges Lemaître), the model was hopelessly wrong in its predictions of the universe's level of order today. If there had indeed already been an infinite number of cycles, the universe today should be in a state of maximum disorder. As the New Scientist article pointed out:

"Such a universe would be uniformly lukewarm and featureless, and definitely lacking such complicated beings as stars, planets and physicists—nothing like the one we see around us."

The attempted rescue suggestion, viz. that the universe just gets bigger with every cycle, therefore isn't yet at maximum disorder, also fails on the same point as the eternal inflation model. I.e., "if your universe keeps getting bigger, it must have started somewhere."
And as for a third idea that the cosmos previously "existed eternally in a static state called the cosmic egg", which later 'cracked' to create the big bang, Vilenkin and research associates have 'cracked' that notion, too. Their work showed that quantum instabilities would force such an 'egg' to collapse after a finite amount of time. And even if it cracked beforehand, leading to the supposed big bang, then this must have happened before it collapsed, and therefore also within a finite amount of time. "This is also not a good candidate for a beginning less universe", says Vilenkin. "All the evidence we have says that the universe had a beginning."

And so in that light, as the editorial of that issue of New Scientist muses, physicists must answer the problem: "How do you get a universe, complete with the laws of physics, out of nothing?"

The One who really is eternal, who exists "from everlasting to everlasting", and whose creation of the space-time construct presents such a conundrum to cosmologists who would deny Him, has already spoken much about the beginning—for those willing to listen. Sadly, even some apologists who believe in the Messiah (such as Hugh Ross and William Lane Craig) have naively been duped into advocating 'God used the big bang and other godless origins ideas'—untenable on all counts. The only way to avoid such error is by believing God's Word—from the very first verse.

Originally from
 here
Posted on Shalom Adventure by: Brenda Miller

 

 

Related Articles

More From Genesis

Opossum

At home one morning the barking would not stop.
Opossum

Monkeys

"God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He…
Monkeys
Love Birds

Love Birds

The name "Lovebird" is an excellent brief description of colorful, pint-size parrots that make…
Love Birds
Moose

Moose

Moose are BIG mammals! They start out as 20- to 35-pound newborns—but when just five days old,…
Moose

Macaws

"There was loud disagreement going on. Maxine and Rainbow were perched far apart screeching at…
Macaws
Creation

Foundation Genesis

According to the most recent polls, over the past 50 years, Americans have been pretty…
Foundation Genesis

Bald Eagles

"The Bible verse found in Isaiah 40:31 says they who "wait upon the Lord . . . shall mount up…
Bald Eagles

Roborovski Hamster

Have you ever met a tiny mouse-like creature and fallen in love? Be careful, it may happen to…
Roborovski Hamster

Goats

The often-pictured mountain goat can thrive in elevations too high and cold for even trees to…
Goats

Cheetahs

You know you are looking at a cheetah if there is what looks like a black "tear mark" running…
Cheetahs

Toucans

"Excuse me, excuse me!"
Toucans

Osprey

 The osprey, or fish hawk, is the only daytime-hunting bird of prey that feeds almost…
Osprey

Bombardier Beetle

It's Not By Accident time again—time to meet another of God's special creatures—that has a…
Bombardier Beetle

Burrowing Owl

The Burrowing Owl lives with unique "NOT BY ACCIDENT" design! Look at the nest material used…
Burrowing Owl

Ravens

One wonders WHY God created the raven with an intelligence which they often use manipulatively…
Ravens
Frogs

Frogs

"I love the Lord, because He has heard My voice" (Psalm 116:1). Next time you go to a pond, see…
Frogs

Publish the Menu module to "offcanvas" position. Here you can publish other modules as well.
Learn More.


donation